| Author |
 Topic  |
|
Chris C 
"Four words, never backwards."
|
 Posted - 10/28/2007 : 14:58:56
|
Sal gets it with the North-East.
Next question please. |
 |
|
|
Salopian 
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 10/29/2007 : 13:12:35
|
| Of F.W.F.R.ers with multiple reviews, who has got the highest lowest review? |
|
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 10/30/2007 : 18:28:18
|
| huh? |
|
|
|
Shiv 
"What a Wonderful World"
|
Posted - 10/30/2007 : 22:44:45
|
quote:
Originally posted by T8tanPa
huh?
I think I get the question, but have no idea how to find the answer. Is this one where you need to be able to do the stats thing? 6 more approvals and I'll be able to do that |
|
|
|
bife
"Winners never quit ... fwfr ... "
|
Posted - 10/31/2007 : 00:12:10
|
| I'll hazard a guess at slippy tin, although i've a feeling there must be somebody who beats his 8. |
|
|
|
thefoxboy 
"Four your eyes only."
|
Posted - 10/31/2007 : 01:02:01
|
quote:
Originally posted by bife
I'll hazard a guess at slippy tin, although i've a feeling there must be somebody who beats his 8.
Also depends on 'multiple', is that 2 reviews or more?
|
|
|
|
Tori
"I don't get it...."
|
Posted - 10/31/2007 : 06:28:56
|
| I don't understand the question. |
|
|
|
bife
"Winners never quit ... fwfr ... "
|
Posted - 10/31/2007 : 08:14:25
|
Sal means something like:
Which reviewer's lowest scoring review has the most votes?
So if there are two reviewers with three reviews each:
John, whose three reviews have 10 votes, 8 votes and 6 votes
Jane, whose three reviews have 100 votes, 50 votes and 2 votes
Then John would be the right answer, because his lowest scoring review has 6 votes, whereas Jane's only has two votes.
Sal has made it harder by excluding any reviewer who doesn't haven't multiple reviews (which I took to mean exclude anybody with just one review)
Clear as mud now  |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 10/31/2007 : 09:32:42
|
quote:
Originally posted by Shiv
quote:
Originally posted by T8tanPa
huh?
I think I get the question, but have no idea how to find the answer. Is this one where you need to be able to do the stats thing? 6 more approvals and I'll be able to do that
No, it wasn't anything too complicated. Just a case of looking through the people at the top of the averages list (including the extras in my version). |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 10/31/2007 : 09:34:26
|
quote:
Originally posted by bife
I'll hazard a guess at slippy tin, although i've a feeling there must be somebody who beats his 8.
That's who I think it is. We cannot be sure, but if a user had multiple reviews all with at least eight votes, then I think we probably would have come across them. |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 10/31/2007 : 09:34:53
|
quote:
Originally posted by thef8xb8y
Also depends on 'multiple', is that 2 reviews or more?
Yes. |
|
|
|
Salopian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 10/31/2007 : 10:07:43
|
quote:
Originally posted by bife
Sal has made it harder by excluding any reviewer who doesn't haven't multiple reviews (which I took to mean exclude anybody with just one review)
Yep, that would just have amounted to the same as my last question, so would have been a bit boring (not that I'm saying this question was interesting - just couldn't think of anything better at the time). |
|
|
|
bife
"Winners never quit ... fwfr ... "
|
Posted - 10/31/2007 : 11:47:32
|
quote:
Originally posted by salopian
(not that I'm saying this question was interesting - just couldn't think of anything better at the time).
Yeah, I do like this game, but coming up with good questions is getting hard. I have exhausted most of my fwfrer knowledge now ... |
|
|
|
BaftaBaby
"Always entranced by cinema."
|
Posted - 10/31/2007 : 13:23:57
|
Question:
Which FWFRer has exhausted his fwfr knowledge?
|
|
|
|
bife
"Winners never quit ... fwfr ... "
|
Posted - 10/31/2007 : 13:41:12
|
Okay, got one
Which fwfrer once desribed their real name as 'sounding like a quick kiss'? |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Fwiffer trivia
