The Four Word Film Review Fourum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Return to homepage
Join fwfr View the top reviews Frequently Asked Questions Click for advanced search
 All Forums
 Film Related
 Films
 2013 Oscars
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 3

randall 
"I like to watch."

Posted - 01/09/2013 :  22:58:34  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
2013 Oscar noms:

http://oscar.go.com/nominees

Edited by - randall on 02/05/2013 11:42:18

BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."

Posted - 01/10/2013 :  15:00:17  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Oscars 2013: Full list of nominees

Best film

Amour
Argo
Beasts Of The Southern Wild
Django Unchained
Les Miserables
Lincoln
Life Of Pi
Silver Linings Playbook
Zero Dark Thirty

Best actress

Jessica Chastain - Zero Dark Thirty
Jennifer Lawrence - Silver Linings Playbook
Emmanuelle Riva - Amour
Quvenzhane Wallis - Beasts of the Southern Wild
Naomi Watts - The Impossible

Best actor

Daniel Day Lewis - Lincoln
Bradley Cooper - Silver Linings Playbook
Hugh Jackman - Les Miserables
Joaquin Phoenix - The Master
Denzel Washington - Flight

Best director

Michael Haneke - Amour
Ang Lee - Life of Pi
David O Russell - Silver Linings Playbook
Steven Spielberg - Lincoln
Benh Zeitlin - Beasts of the Southern Wild

Best supporting actor

Alan Arkin - Argo
Robert De Niro - Silver Linings Playbook
Tommy Lee Jones - Lincoln
Christoph Waltz - Django Unchained
Philip Seymour Hoffman - The Master

Best supporting actress

Amy Adams - The Master
Sally Field - Lincoln
Anne Hathaway - Les Miserables
Helen Hunt - The Sessions
Jacki Weaver - Silver Linings Playbook

Best foreign film

Amour
No
War witch
A Royal Affair
Kon-Tiki

Best animated film

Brave
Frankenweenie
Paranorman
Pirates! Band of Misfits (UK title: Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists)
Wreck-it Ralph

Best documentary film

5 Broken Cameras
The Gatekeepers
How To Survive A Plague
The Invisible War
Searching For Sugarman

Music (original song)

Before My Time (Chasing Ice) - Music and Lyric by J. Ralph
Everybody Needs A Best Friend (Ted) - Music by Walter Murphy, Lyric by Seth MacFarlane
Pi's lullaby (Life Of Pi) - Music by Mychael Danna, Lyric by Bombay Jayashri
Skyfall (Skyfall) - Music and Lyric by Adele Adkins and Paul Epworth
Suddenly (Les Miserables) - Music by Claude-Michel Schonberg, Lyric by Herbert Kretzmer and Alain Boublil

Music (original score)

Anna Karenina - Dario Marianelli
Argo - Alexandre Desplat
Life Of Pi - Mychael Danna
Lincoln - John Williams
Skyfall - Thomas Newman

Adapted screenplay

Argo - Chris Terrio
Beasts Of The Southern Wild - Lucy Alibar and Benh Zeitlin
Life Of Pi - David Magee
Lincoln - Tony Kushner
Silver Linings Playbook - David O Russell

Original screenplay

Amour - Michael Haneke
Django Unchained - Quentin Tarantino
Flight - John Gatins
Moonrise Kingdom - Wes Anderson and Roman Coppola
Zero Dark Thirty - Mark Boal

Cinematography

Anna Karenina - Seamus McGarvey
Django Unchained - Robert Richardson
Life of Pi - Claudio Miranda
Lincoln - Janusz Kaminski
Skyfall - Roger Deakins

Costume Design

Anna Karenina - Jacqueline Durran
Les Miserables - Paco Delgado
Lincoln - Joanna Johnston
Mirror Mirror - Eiko Ishioka
Snow White and the Huntsman - Colleen Atwood

Best documentary short subject

Inocente
Kings Point
Mondays at Racine
Open Heart
Redemption

Film editing

Argo - William Goldenberg
Life of Pi - Tim Squyres
Lincoln - Michael Kahn
Silver Linings Playbook - Jay Cassidy and Crispin Struthers
Zero Dark Thirty - Dylan Tichenor and William Goldenberg

Make-up and Hairstyling

Hitchcock - Howard Berger, Peter Montagna and Martin Samuel
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey - Peter Swords King, Rick Findlater and Tami Lane
Les Miserables - Lisa Westcott and Julie Dartnell

Production Design

Anna Karenina - Sarah Greenwood and Katie Spencer
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey - Dan Hennah, Ra Vincent and Simon Bright
Les Miserables - Eve Stewart and Anna Lynch-Robinson
Life Of Pi - David Gropman and Anna Pinnock
Lincoln - Rick Carter and Jim Erickson

Short film (animated)

Adam and the Dog
Fresh Guacamole
Head Over Heels
Maggie Simpson in The Longest Daycare
Paperman

Short film (live action)

Asad
Buzkashi Boys
Curfew
Death of a Shadow (Dood Van Een Schaduw)
Henry

Sound editing

Argo - Erik Aadahl and Ethan van der Ryn
Django Unchained - Wylie Stateman
Life Of Pi - Eugene Gearty and Philip Stockton
Skyfall - Per Hallberg and Karen Baker Landers
Zero Dark Thirty - Paul NJ Ottosson

Sound mixing

Argo - John Reitz, Gregg Rudloff and Jose Antonio Garcia
Les Miserables - Andy Nelson, Mark Paterson and Simon Hayes
Life Of Pi - Ron Bartlett, DM Hemphill and Drew Kunin
Lincoln - Andy Nelson, Gary Rydstrom and Ronald Judkins
Skyfall - Scott Millan, Greg P Russell and Stuart Wilson

Visual effects

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey - Joe Letteri, Eric Saindon, David Clayton and R Christopher White
Life Of Pi - Bill Westenhofer, Guillaume Rocheron, Erik-Jan De Boer and Donald R Elliott
Marvel's The Avengers (UK title: Marvel's Avengers Assemble) - Janek Sirrs, Jeff White, Guy Williams and Dan Sudick
Prometheus - Richard Stammers, Trevor Wood, Charley Henley and Martin Hill
Snow White and the Huntsman - Cedric Nicolas-Troyan, Philip Brennan, Neil Corbould and Michael Dawson

Go to Top of Page

randall 
"I like to watch."

Posted - 01/10/2013 :  15:03:30  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Biggest shock: Directing noms. At least three others deserved it.
Go to Top of Page

TitanPa 
"Here four more"

Posted - 01/10/2013 :  17:01:55  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Since Best Picture went to ten, Best Director should have as well. Im surprised Ben Affleck was snubbed.
Go to Top of Page

GHcool 
"Forever a curious character."

Posted - 01/10/2013 :  18:18:27  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I haven't seen many of the nominated movies, so here are the categories I have an informed opinion about:

Best Supporting Actor
Should Win: Tommy Lee Jones for Lincoln
Shouldn't Win: Alan Arkin for Argo
Who Was Snubbed: Jim Broadbent for Cloud Atlas

Best Original Screenplay
Should Win: Flight
Shouldn't Win: Moonrise Kingdom
Who Was Snubbed: ParaNorman

Best Film Editing
Should Win: Argo
Shouldn't Win: Lincoln
Who Was Snubbed: Cloud Atlas

Best Visual Effects
Should Win: Hobbit
Shouldn't Win: Snow White and the Huntsman
Who Was Snubbed: Cloud Atlas

Best Score
Should Win: Anna Karenina
Shouldn't Win: Argo
Who Was Snubbed: Frankenweenie

Best Sound Mixing
Should Win: Lincoln
Shouldn't Win: Argo
Who Was Snubbed: Hobbit

I am a little surprised that Cloud Atlas did not even receive one nomination. Surely it was one of the most ambitious films of the year and even though it didn't succeed as well as it might have, it deserves some recognition. Lincoln did as well as I had hoped, though that was no surprise. Anna Karenina and The Hobbit were two other ambitious, technically accomplished films that received the right nominations, though it might have been nice to see more for each. The biggest surprise for me was Snow White and the Huntsman's two nominations.
Go to Top of Page

randall 
"I like to watch."

Posted - 01/10/2013 :  21:16:54  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by TitanPA

Since Best Picture went to ten, Best Director should have as well. Im surprised Ben Affleck was snubbed.


Of course, there were many pics nommed without their directors back when it was five and five. And AMPAS has always been infamous for lifetime snubbing of celebrated directors like Kubrick and Hitchcock -- and, until very recently, Scorsese. Ben Affleck's agent undoubtedly had to remind him thusly upon this very day.

I'm surprised about Affleck as well, also Bigelow and Hooper [though there's a backlash beginning against LES MIZ -- I believe as voting proceeds, the only lock to survive will be Anne Hathaway]. But especially Q, who got nommed for picture and screenplay, and riddle me this: how many currently working directors have placed their personal stamp so clearly on their flicks that you can guess the dir without a title card? Q is first on that list, which also MAYBE includes Scorsese, Spielberg, possibly Woody Allen, and weird outliers like David Lynch. If you like DJANGO, you liked the direction, AMPASers! They're not allergic: PULP FICTION won a screenwriting Oscar, but then, that was the only one which went to CITIZEN KANE as well.

I should note that the largest bloc of Academy voters by far is actors. [I don't know how BAFTA skews. Do you, Baffy?]

Edited by - randall on 01/11/2013 00:17:53
Go to Top of Page

BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."

Posted - 01/11/2013 :  00:25:40  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by randall



I should note that the largest bloc of Academy voters by far is actors. [I don't know how BAFTA skews. Do you, Baffy?]



BAFTA has never invited many actors to its elite industry ranks. Traditionally it's been an Academy of behind-the-sceners, the craft sector. Only relatively recently [the past 2 or 3 decades]has there been an influx of publicity people, front office admin, and bottom-liners.

Actors still are very under-represented. But then, there's always been a sad and widespread misunderstanding about what it is that actors actually do. And - with the emergence of rabid celebrity culture - what their qualifications might be.

Personally, I was only invited to join for my work in media journalism, not as an actress.

This ain't the place, but I have a lot of misgivings about the evolution of major film award ceremonies and what leads up to them. When all this year's season has become a memory - and, if you like, I'll share them with you.

But thanks for asking!

Go to Top of Page

Joe Blevins 
"Don't I look handsome?"

Posted - 01/11/2013 :  00:37:57  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I'll see most of these movies when the Best Picture Showcase rolls around, but I have to say the biggest -- and only -- surprise of the day for me was Amour, which got nominations in multiple high-profile categories.

I'm amazed that Michael Haneke has made a film which can be openly embraced by the notoriously timid and conservative Academy. Is the new film a radical change in style for him?
Go to Top of Page

randall 
"I like to watch."

Posted - 01/11/2013 :  01:05:23  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BaftaBabe

quote:
Originally posted by randall



I should note that the largest bloc of Academy voters by far is actors. [I don't know how BAFTA skews. Do you, Baffy?]



BAFTA has never invited many actors to its elite industry ranks. Traditionally it's been an Academy of behind-the-sceners, the craft sector. Only relatively recently [the past 2 or 3 decades]has there been an influx of publicity people, front office admin, and bottom-liners.

Actors still are very under-represented. But then, there's always been a sad and widespread misunderstanding about what it is that actors actually do. And - with the emergence of rabid celebrity culture - what their qualifications might be.

Personally, I was only invited to join for my work in media journalism, not as an actress.

This ain't the place, but I have a lot of misgivings about the evolution of major film award ceremonies and what leads up to them. When all this year's season has become a memory - and, if you like, I'll share them with you.

But thanks for asking!




Can't tell from your post whether you think either more actors or more below-the-line [and off-the-line, like elite journalists such as yourself] peeps are more representative voters. I'd love to hear those misgivings to get it straight in my own mind after the whirl of awards season has passed. AMPAS is also heavily weighted below the line; the actors are only the single most prevalent voting bloc. I repeat: are you aware of similar stats re BAFTA?
Go to Top of Page

BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."

Posted - 01/11/2013 :  01:23:27  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by randall

quote:
Originally posted by BaftaBabe

quote:
Originally posted by randall



I should note that the largest bloc of Academy voters by far is actors. [I don't know how BAFTA skews. Do you, Baffy?]



BAFTA has never invited many actors to its elite industry ranks. Traditionally it's been an Academy of behind-the-sceners, the craft sector. Only relatively recently [the past 2 or 3 decades]has there been an influx of publicity people, front office admin, and bottom-liners.

Actors still are very under-represented. But then, there's always been a sad and widespread misunderstanding about what it is that actors actually do. And - with the emergence of rabid celebrity culture - what their qualifications might be.

Personally, I was only invited to join for my work in media journalism, not as an actress.

This ain't the place, but I have a lot of misgivings about the evolution of major film award ceremonies and what leads up to them. When all this year's season has become a memory - and, if you like, I'll share them with you.

But thanks for asking!




Can't tell from your post whether you think either more actors or more below-the-line [and off-the-line, like elite journalists such as yourself] peeps are more representative voters. I'd love to hear those misgivings to get it straight in my own mind after the whirl of awards season has passed. AMPAS is also heavily weighted below the line; the actors are only the single most prevalent voting bloc. I repeat: are you aware of similar stats re BAFTA?



Not sure those figures are broken down by blocs - I don't believe there are voting blocs as such - unless I'm not understanding what you mean by that.

This BAFTA page explains about as much as I know about demographics. Don't have time right now to detail exact voting process -- in any case it's changed this year.

Sorry, bedtime beckons ...

Go to Top of Page

demonic 
"Cinemaniac"

Posted - 01/11/2013 :  06:22:36  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Joe Blevins
I'm amazed that Michael Haneke has made a film which can be openly embraced by the notoriously timid and conservative Academy. Is the new film a radical change in style for him?



I'm pretty astonished by this too - it's a deserving nomination, of course, but I can't quite believe the Academy has put it on the same ticket as Silver Linings Playbook etc. It's a slightly different film for Haneke, less concerned with the threat of violence and his standard cool detachment, it's a true character study but no more comfortable a watch than Hidden or The White Ribbon because of the uncomfortable subject matter, presented unflichingly as he does so well. It's a big step for the Academy, for sure. It's a grown-up, important film amongst the many standard Hollywood glossies.

This inclusion raises a big point for me. The change to 10 nominees bugged the hell out of me when they first tried it a couple of years ago, and it's still annoying me now. This year they couldn't even think of 10 worthy films, it's only 9, and Amour is duplicated on the Foreign Language Oscar, which seems a terrible waste given it will clearly win that latter category (and if it doesn't that suggests that whatever does should have been on the Best Picture ticket instead). If making the list 10 was all about giving twice as many deserving films the extra boost why not do exactly that??

Another issue this raises is the suggestion that Amour is special enough to leap across from Foreign Language to Best Picture. Can anyone tell me when this has happened before? To my mind it makes the Foreign category something of a joke, as if every film nominated for Best Picture is automatically better than the films nominated each year for Foreign Language (obviously not the case). I think these categories should be separate and remain separate, and the Best Picture nominees should go back to five.

Edited by - demonic on 01/11/2013 16:48:33
Go to Top of Page

randall 
"I like to watch."

Posted - 01/11/2013 :  06:28:24  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BaftaBabe

quote:
Originally posted by randall

quote:
Originally posted by BaftaBabe

quote:
Originally posted by randall



I should note that the largest bloc of Academy voters by far is actors. [I don't know how BAFTA skews. Do you, Baffy?]



BAFTA has never invited many actors to its elite industry ranks. Traditionally it's been an Academy of behind-the-sceners, the craft sector. Only relatively recently [the past 2 or 3 decades]has there been an influx of publicity people, front office admin, and bottom-liners.

Actors still are very under-represented. But then, there's always been a sad and widespread misunderstanding about what it is that actors actually do. And - with the emergence of rabid celebrity culture - what their qualifications might be.

Personally, I was only invited to join for my work in media journalism, not as an actress.

This ain't the place, but I have a lot of misgivings about the evolution of major film award ceremonies and what leads up to them. When all this year's season has become a memory - and, if you like, I'll share them with you.

But thanks for asking!




Can't tell from your post whether you think either more actors or more below-the-line [and off-the-line, like elite journalists such as yourself] peeps are more representative voters. I'd love to hear those misgivings to get it straight in my own mind after the whirl of awards season has passed. AMPAS is also heavily weighted below the line; the actors are only the single most prevalent voting bloc. I repeat: are you aware of similar stats re BAFTA?



Not sure those figures are broken down by blocs - I don't believe there are voting blocs as such - unless I'm not understanding what you mean by that.

This BAFTA page explains about as much as I know about demographics. Don't have time right now to detail exact voting process -- in any case it's changed this year.

Sorry, bedtime beckons ...




Sorry, I should have used the term "branch" rather than "bloc." AMPAS also has about 6,000 members, divided into 15 "branches," the most populous of which is the Actors Branch.

http://www.oscars.org/academy/history-organization/branches.html

Don't bother to "detail exact voting process" on my account -- it's not germane.

Edited by - randall on 01/11/2013 06:31:33
Go to Top of Page

BaftaBaby 
"Always entranced by cinema."

Posted - 01/11/2013 :  10:11:42  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by randall


Sorry, I should have used the term "branch" rather than "bloc." AMPAS also has about 6,000 members, divided into 15 "branches," the most populous of which is the Actors Branch.

http://www.oscars.org/academy/history-organization/branches.html

Don't bother to "detail exact voting process" on my account -- it's not germane.



Ah - sorry for not twigging! In any case - there IS NO actors chapter/branch/bloc whatever. Which is one of the reasons I think the whole process needs re-visiting. At some later date!!!!

Go to Top of Page

randall 
"I like to watch."

Posted - 01/11/2013 :  12:10:11  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The reason it's significant in AMPAS's case is that nominations in most categories are done by the various branches: actors nominate the actors, directors nominate the directors, etc. [Everybody noms Best Picture and votes for the final awards in all categories.]

The LA Times recently did a survey, which has been poo-poohed by some, showing that AMPAS is overwhelmingly white and old [once you're invited in, the membership is for life; some voting members haven't worked in decades], which helps account for its stodgy reputation as cited by Joe, and may be why older helmers don't cotton to, say, QT [I felt his omission as dir was the most egregious blunder] as much as the contemporary audience does.

That said, the only Oscar I really care about this year is Doc. SUGAR MAN must win, even though its sweet, altruistic subject might say, "it's an honor just to be nominated."
Go to Top of Page

randall 
"I like to watch."

Posted - 01/11/2013 :  20:06:16  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Um, Baffy, I just went back and read the BAFTA noms which you posted. So, my darling, what are "Chapter members"?
Go to Top of Page

w22dheartlivie 
"Kitty Lover"

Posted - 01/11/2013 :  21:06:05  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Well, I've been quite vocal on my thoughts on the huge snub dealt the inimitable John Hawkes for The Sessions, which left me aghast at the embrace of awards hater Joaquin Phoenix, who is apparently going for the Marlon Brando bloc of voters, or perhaps he's counting on the Scientology bloc? I have my favorites, 'tis true, and from that, I can't help but root now for Daniel Day-Lewis, who actually tugged at my Abraham Lincoln-loving heartstrings and made me cry at the trailer shown on oscar.go.com. Although I know she's not the favorite, I'll root for Naomi Watts for The Impossible and back the favorite Anne Hathaway. My favorites really seem to circulate around those who made the biggest physical sacrifices, I think. Alas, I still have a month or so to catch what I've not yet seen.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
The Four Word Film Review Fourum © 1999-2024 benj clews Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000