| Author |
 Topic  |
|
Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"
|
 Posted - 11/27/2006 : 14:15:19
|
| A film has been auto-added here that I do not think Rovark will want. (Other Cleopatra films are not there.) |
Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 11/27/2006 15:37:38 |
|
|
ChocolateLady
"500 Chocolate Delights"
|
Posted - 11/27/2006 : 14:19:28
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
A film has been auto-added http://www.fwfr.com/search.asp?accid=1999here[url] that I do not think Rovark will want. (Other Cleopatra films are not there.)
For that matter, what are the Princess Diaries doing in there? |
 |
|
|
benj clews 
"...."
|
Posted - 11/27/2006 : 14:27:52
|
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady
For that matter, what are the Princess Diaries doing in there?
It's got Aries in it. |
|
|
|
Whippersnapper. 
"A fourword thinking guy."
|
Posted - 11/27/2006 : 15:37:09
|
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
quote:
Originally posted by ChocolateLady
For that matter, what are the Princess Diaries doing in there?
It's got Aries in it.
 |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 11/27/2006 : 15:37:15
|
| Same thing then. It might have been that someone would want any film containing -aries- etc., but since he doesn't have pre-existing -leo- films, I doubt this is the case. |
|
|
|
benj clews
"...."
|
Posted - 11/27/2006 : 16:44:30
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
Same thing then. It might have been that someone would want any film containing -aries- etc., but since he doesn't have pre-existing -leo- films, I doubt this is the case.
...unless Rovark said exclude the Cleopatra films that matched at the time, but future Cleopatras still ended up being added. |
|
|
|
Rovark
"Luck-pushing, rule-bending, chance-taking reviewer"
|
Posted - 12/14/2006 : 19:58:02
|
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
Same thing then. It might have been that someone would want any film containing -aries- etc., but since he doesn't have pre-existing -leo- films, I doubt this is the case.
...unless Rovark said exclude the Cleopatra films that matched at the time, but future Cleopatras still ended up being added.
Yup, and it's a shame to lose films when I don't have that sign mentioned elswhere, but these partials aren't the point of the accolade so ....
Oh I'm gonna hate myself in the morning for this but I've left in
carry on cLEO 1964
looking for aLIBRAndi 2000
princess diARIES 2001
Just because I want as many zodiac signs in there as possible. If a real "LEO" etc ever crops up, they'll go but until then   |
Edited by - Rovark on 12/14/2006 20:26:00 |
|
|
|
lemmycaution 
"Long mired in film"
|
Posted - 12/14/2006 : 20:36:19
|
quote:
Originally posted by Rovark
quote:
Originally posted by benj clews
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
Same thing then. It might have been that someone would want any film containing -aries- etc., but since he doesn't have pre-existing -leo- films, I doubt this is the case.
...unless Rovark said exclude the Cleopatra films that matched at the time, but future Cleopatras still ended up being added.
Yup, and it's a shame to lose films when I don't have that sign mentioned elswhere, but these partials aren't the point of the accolade so ....
Oh I'm gonna hate myself in the morning for this but I've left in
carry on cLEO 1964
looking for aLIBRAndi 2000
princess diARIES 2001
Just because I want as many zodiac signs in there as possible. If a real "LEO" etc ever crops up, they'll go but until then
There is one now. |
Edited by - lemmycaution on 12/18/2006 01:01:26 |
|
|
|
Rovark
"Luck-pushing, rule-bending, chance-taking reviewer"
|
Posted - 12/18/2006 : 20:18:49
|
quote:
Originally posted by lemmycaution
quote:
Originally posted by Rovark
Yup, and it's a shame to lose films when I don't have that sign mentioned elswhere, but these partials aren't the point of the accolade so ....
Oh I'm gonna hate myself in the morning for this but I've left in
carry on cLEO 1964
looking for aLIBRAndi 2000
princess diARIES 2001
Just because I want as many zodiac signs in there as possible. If a real "LEO" etc ever crops up, they'll go but until then
There is one now.
cLEO - don't Carry On
LEO The Last - wins
cheers Lemmy |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 01/01/2007 : 01:35:42
|
| And Benj, a query about the auto-updating: if a cast list is corrected so that someone is removed (as I think may happen with Hrithik Roshan in I See You, which would affect one of my accolades), does that film automatically leave the accolade, or is it a one-way thing? |
|
|
|
demonic
"Cinemaniac"
|
Posted - 02/26/2007 : 18:39:37
|
This accolade needs an auto update
|
|
|
|
thefoxboy
"Four your eyes only."
|
Posted - 05/02/2008 : 06:24:49
|
quote:
Originally posted by Downtown
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
This one is out of control.
The user seems new and there's no guarantee he even reads the fourum.
B-ROD has been around for ages, I think he/she has posted in the fourum before. |
|
|
|
benj clews
"...."
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 06/24/2010 : 16:07:51
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
The third one should be added here.
So should the fourth one. |
Edited by - Demisemicenturian on 02/05/2011 06:09:02 |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 07/10/2010 : 19:06:41
|
| B.B., I think you mean homophones here, not homonyms. It can be taken as read that homonyms are allowed! |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Accolade correction
