| Author |
 Topic  |
|
randall 
"I like to watch."
|
 Posted - 01/09/2013 : 21:36:07
|
quote:
Originally posted by lemmycaution
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by randall
If you don't have a whole page of 0-votes, we'll consider 1-votes, etc. Just give us your stragglers!
As I don't have any 0s, I thought I couldn't enter, but now here you are.
By the way, I don't think anyone 'abused' it. Wasn't there just someone new who was overgenerous and voted for all of the reviews?
Whoever it was (new or old) he/she didn't vote for all of the players. I among others did not lose all of my 0 vote reviews. The selectivity made the whole thing a little odder.
Yes, the mysterious "blanket vote" was strangely subjective, which disillusioned us all and forced me to retire the very popular game, since someone elected to tilt it for still unknown reasons. So yes, an innocent game was abused. |
 |
|
|
Larry 
"Larry's time / sat merrily"
|
Posted - 01/10/2013 : 15:36:46
|
Voted for everyone entered to here. Any more late-comers? |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian 
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 01/11/2013 : 22:33:54
|
quote:
Originally posted by lemmycaution
Whoever it was (new or old) he/she didn't vote for all of the players. I among others did not lose all of my 0 vote reviews. The selectivity made the whole thing a little odder.
Oh, I didn't remember that part. I don't think there was any malice in it, but I agree that it takes the enjoyment out of it; however, I feel similarly when, from a thread like this, someone votes for one of the occasional reviews of mine that cannot possibly be understood in isolation. |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 01/11/2013 : 22:37:01
|
quote:
Originally posted by koudy
Loved many from Demonic's and Salopian's.
quote:
Originally posted by lemmycaution
Got everyone so far this round.
Thanks.  |
|
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 01/12/2013 : 03:36:41
|
Im sad to say I have a lot of 0's. The other day I had a hard time showing my 12's since I didnt have alot of them, but the good thig is I will have some on hand no matter who votes for what.
0000000000000
I hope I wasnt to late. Will start voting over the weekend. |
Edited by - TitanPa on 01/12/2013 03:37:48 |
|
|
|
lemmycaution
"Long mired in film"
|
Posted - 01/12/2013 : 04:25:28
|
quote:
Originally posted by TitanPA
Im sad to say I have a lot of 0's. The other day I had a hard time showing my 12's since I didnt have alot of them, but the good thig is I will have some on hand no matter who votes for what.
0000000000000
I hope I wasnt to late. Will start voting over the weekend.
Not too late and gotcha. |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 01/12/2013 : 05:22:51
|
I hadn't noticed all of randall's lengthy opening post, so am reposting here in order to comply with the rules. Obviously I don't expect anyone who visited my original link to look at this one, but it would be nice if other people did.
(1) I have read and carefully considered all of the reviews linked to in this thread.
(2) Here are my reviews. |
|
|
|
Demisemicenturian
"Four ever European"
|
Posted - 01/12/2013 : 05:28:49
|
quote:
Originally posted by randall
Yes, the mysterious "blanket vote" was strangely subjective, which disillusioned us all and forced me to retire the very popular game, since someone elected to tilt it for still unknown reasons. So yes, an innocent game was abused.
Well, I still think that it is rather a stretch to call that abuse, but anyway, what on Earth are you talking about here? The over-voting happened in Canklefetish's thing, not yours. |
|
|
|
TitanPa
"Here four more"
|
Posted - 01/12/2013 : 20:23:37
|
| Voted to here. Sure walloped a lot of reviews. |
|
|
|
randall
"I like to watch."
|
Posted - 01/13/2013 : 17:12:19
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by lemmycaution
Whoever it was (new or old) he/she didn't vote for all of the players. I among others did not lose all of my 0 vote reviews. The selectivity made the whole thing a little odder.
Oh, I didn't remember that part. I don't think there was any malice in it, but I agree that it takes the enjoyment out of it; however, I feel similarly when, from a thread like this, someone votes for one of the occasional reviews of mine that cannot possibly be understood in isolation.
Not only wouldn't I vote for such a review, but also, were I a MERP, I would never approve one which "cannot possibly be understood in isolation." Evidently the real MERPs disagree with me on this aspect, since those "occasional reviews" do show up, as you have just attested. |
Edited by - randall on 01/13/2013 17:13:50 |
|
|
|
randall
"I like to watch."
|
Posted - 01/13/2013 : 17:13:10
|
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
I hadn't noticed all of randall's lengthy opening post, so am reposting here in order to comply with the rules. Obviously I don't expect anyone who visited my original link to look at this one, but it would be nice if other people did.
(1) I have read and carefully considered all of the reviews linked to in this thread.
(2) Here are my reviews.
Lengthy? |
|
|
|
lemmycaution
"Long mired in film"
|
Posted - 01/13/2013 : 18:44:24
|
As far as I am concerned, a review which "cannot possibly be understood in isolation." is no review at all.
As it happens I have two reviews in this FYCTH round which are best read in tandem, but each can also be understood in isolation. |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
0-VOTE MANIA HAS RISEN FROM THE GRAVE!
