| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| BaftaBaby |
Posted - 08/23/2012 : 19:03:59
Four Your Consideration - Treasure Hunt
Se�n Says: New time, new reviews!
--> Put any five reviews you like in your F.Y.C. list.
--> Do not use reviews from the previous round - you must change them every round.
--> Post here to declare that you've done it. Sooner is better than later.
--> Provide a spoiler warning in your post when appropriate.
--> You must read the F.Y.C.s of all participants.
--> The next round starts on Monday or Thursday at 6:00 a.m. FWFR time, whichever comes next.
|
| 15 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| randall |
Posted - 08/27/2012 : 18:26:19
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
quote:
Originally posted by randall
I thought two or three of those were worth my vote [still think so], and I tried, but the site wouldn't accept my votes, despite repeated clicking. I logged out, logged in again, and tried again. End of effort, pal. You are the sole and single fwiffer whose reviews caused this problem, so how exactly is it that you post differently from all others?
I post links www.fwxr.com (because that is the version I use in general, since I can't find my way around the new one) and www.fwfr.co.uk (because that is the U.R.L. I prefer; if Benj wanted only www.fwfr.com to be used then he would have applied that long ago). However, it has never been a requirement to post links at all: anyone can just click on the user's name on the left if any links given are not convenient for them. This has been pointed quite a large number of times by other people, and it's what I do myself.
OK, fair enough, I went back and voted as you suggested. However, you should be aware that the link you post to the new site is useless to anyone who wants to vote for a review of yours. [I only just made the full transition myself, and previously voted your reviews on the old site.] |
| Beanmimo |
Posted - 08/27/2012 : 17:27:10
V&V |
| koudy |
Posted - 08/27/2012 : 07:05:33
Wonderful round. Loved every set.
Voted. |
| ChocolateLady |
Posted - 08/27/2012 : 06:33:59
Gotcha all! |
| chazbo |
Posted - 08/27/2012 : 05:06:41
Yes.
|
| Larry |
Posted - 08/26/2012 : 23:45:50
quote:
Originally posted by demonic
VV - 5/5s for Larry and [matt].
Cheers, demonic.
Did the votey thing. |
| lemmycaution |
Posted - 08/26/2012 : 22:54:04
Yep. |
| demonic |
Posted - 08/26/2012 : 22:21:36
VV - 5/5s for Larry and [matt]. |
| Salopian |
Posted - 08/26/2012 : 21:44:53
quote:
Originally posted by randall
I thought two or three of those were worth my vote [still think so], and I tried, but the site wouldn't accept my votes, despite repeated clicking. I logged out, logged in again, and tried again. End of effort, pal. You are the sole and single fwiffer whose reviews caused this problem, so how exactly is it that you post differently from all others?
I post links www.fwxr.com (because that is the version I use in general, since I can't find my way around the new one) and www.fwfr.co.uk (because that is the U.R.L. I prefer; if Benj wanted only www.fwfr.com to be used then he would have applied that long ago). However, it has never been a requirement to post links at all: anyone can just click on the user's name on the left if any links given are not convenient for them. This has been pointed quite a large number of times by other people, and it's what I do myself. |
| BaftaBaby |
Posted - 08/26/2012 : 21:10:47
vv & Happy Bank Hol for the UK contingent
|
| randall |
Posted - 08/26/2012 : 20:02:09
quote:
Originally posted by Salopian
My five most recently approved reviews
That might not seem particularly notable but this is the first time in many years that all of my reviews (except a few that I have reported as duplicates before their turn came) have been in the F.Y.C.T.H. I virtually always include them in approximately approval order; for a long time I had a lag of about fifty, then I completed all my Cine File accolades and was hundreds behind. So it feels very satisfying to get up to date at long, long last!
I thought two or three of those were worth my vote [still think so], and I tried, but the site wouldn't accept my votes, despite repeated clicking. I logged out, logged in again, and tried again. End of effort, pal. You are the sole and single fwiffer whose reviews caused this problem, so how exactly is it that you post differently from all others?
Otherwise, V&V. |
| Salopian |
Posted - 08/26/2012 : 18:36:12
My five most recently approved reviews
That might not seem particularly notable but this is the first time in many years that all of my reviews (except a few that I have reported as duplicates before their turn came) have been in the F.Y.C.T.H. I virtually always include them in approximately approval order; for a long time I had a lag of about fifty, then I completed all my Cine File accolades and was hundreds behind. So it feels very satisfying to get up to date at long, long last! |
| lemmycaution |
Posted - 08/25/2012 : 22:46:39
Lemmy in for #847. |
| ChocolateLady |
Posted - 08/25/2012 : 11:50:30
quote:
Originally posted by [matt]
Four Woof Film Reviews
HA! I'd already voted on three of these, but the other two are equally worthy of votes. |
| [matt] |
Posted - 08/24/2012 : 12:17:32
Four Woof Film Reviews
|
